I guess I've started downloading "the profile", it will supposedly notify me when it's finished downloading, but I can't confirm that's actually happening. I wonder how many people have gotten malware because of this lack of documentation.Sorry, frustrated as heck.OK, finally stumbled on the instructions in a MacWorld article. Seems an opportunist noticed this gaping vacuum that Apple created and stepped in to "fill it". I find instructions for installing Beta versions of iOS, but don't see anything about how to get the app without actually installing a beta OS.I did find a (sketchy as F.) website called < - (don't click) that downloads and tries to install software on my Mac. I can find no info on the web or the searching the developer site about how to "install a beta profile". Nothing.About 5 minutes of searching brings me back to a well-hidden sentence on that page saying that it's on the home screen if you have a Beta version installed, but you can enable it on the publicly released versions by "installing a beta profile".I have no idea what that means. But I didn't see anything obvious about how to get it. But the conclusion I have drawn is correct and you will see this whether you reflect on it now or stick around long enough to see the economics play out.This page talks about the Feedback Assistant app for developers, and how it's the preferred way to submit feedback. To say that Linux was the last free software was obviously hyperbole. If pure intentions counted then both might be successful but unfortunately it’s not the case. People respect free software because it is “virtuous.” It’s a very short sighted notion that shares its roots with communism. And this doesn’t come as a surprise to anyone who has closely scrutinized the whole picture.Īnd the whole thing is made worse by the politicization of free software. And as the circumstances change it only becomes more clear that free labor won’t be a successful model for software. It was a set of circumstances that created the illusion that the shackles of capitalism had been broken. And the average programmer historically was very intelligent and wealthy. The other is the cultural circumstances surrounding software historically, where often people were being pioneers with their contributions, contributing to the grand vision of computers and the internet which only very recently has been realized. One of them is the unique property of software not needing any physical resources to be created or distributed. Not a joke! There are reasons why this fundamental truth has been obscured for the short amount of time that software has existed on a meaningful scale. We need more editors so that we do not end up having one winner and then the winner starts becoming a slow monster. I will spend some time but if anyone takes some time to figure these out, please share them. Plus plugins like Prettier, Git viewer and some other tooling. But getting debugger and project level browsing setup should be really easy and I feel VS Code does this, even if the overall UX is a bit slower. I have an i5 9th Gen/20GB laptop now and I would still like a faster editor/IDE. I could not see how to set debug breakpoints on the editor gutter (left). But I could not see how to browse within the components/files (Ctrl+Click usually) in the folder that I opened (TypeScript/Deno project). It is definitely faster to launch and overall UI felt more responsive even in a couple clicks. When I had a slower laptop (I ran Arch on an 8GB/i5 4th Gen) I felt the need for a faster editor. I used to use Sublime a couple years back, I do not remember having a paid license though.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |